Re: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?

To: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 16:29:16 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:51:20 EDT." <2.2.32.19980423165120.0191f9f4@pop.lyceum.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> At 08:09 1998/04/23 -0400, Leon McCalla wrote:
> >Can a 4004 call a cisco 1004 at 128k?
> 
> from my last attempts at dialing to similar cisco box,
> it required the telco to put a hunt group on the ISDN BRI
> that I was calling to...

6.0 Pipeline code has "Alt Dial #1" and "Alt dial #2" and "Alt Dial #3"
parameters. My guess is that you could have used that to specify the
BRI's second DN instead of requiring the hunt group.

Then again I may be misinterpreting the purpose of those parameters.

Then again the Max doesn't even have them! (only Pipelines)

> Now both the max and cisco have software with compatable
> BACP so the cisco should be able to send its second phone number
> to the max that way, and need no hunt group.

You have to use 11.3 on the Cisco to support that, right?

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?

From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) ASCEND MPP vs WIN95 Multilink
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Can I busy ports on a 4048 for testing purposes
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?
Next by thread: Re[2]: (ASCEND) call a cisco 1004 at 128K?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread