(ASCEND) Re: GRF problems with gated

["John G. Scudder" <jgs@holmes.ieng.com>]

Neil J. McRae said:
...
> I ran group type routing on the GRF and group type internal on the
> BSDI machine and used a static route to resolve the next hop address
> that the two machines needed.
...

I don't know your configuration in detail, but it's worth pointing
out that it's likely you didn't need to resolve nexthops with
static.  You probably could have listed the interface on the shared
medium in the group type routing clause.  E.g., supposing that ef0
was the interface on the shared net:

    group type routing peeras XXX proto YYY interface ef0 {

(By the definitition of group type internal, you must have had a
shared medium, in terms of which the group type internal peer would
write the bgp nexthop.  The configuration above makes the group
type routing peer do likewise.)

Regards,

--John

--
John G. Scudder                       email:  jgs@ieng.com
Internet Engineering Group, LLC       phone:  (734) 213-4939 ext 14
122 S. Main, Suite 280                fax:    (734) 669-8661
Ann Arbor, MI  48104                  www:    http://www.ieng.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Connectivity - MS Routing
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) backto 5.0ApXX from 6.0.0
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Unwanted Max4000 or 4060's
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Re: GRF problems with gated
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread