Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Load balancing with GRF
At 11:52 AM 4/4/98 -0600, Andy Walden wrote:
>
>We bought a GRF to replace our cisco 2501. We also decided to add two more
>T1 to another provider in addition to the two we have to mci and run bgp4
>accoss them and take advantage of load balancing.
>
>We started to set things up yesterday with the new provider which has a
>cisco 75xx on their end. The problem is the only way we could get things
>up was with a seperate peering session over each T1. This is fine for
>redundancy, but does jack for load balancing. All I really caught out
>of it was the cisco wanted to peer with the soft address and the GRF
>wanted the serial and wouldn't handle two routes pointing seperate
>ways. Our Ascend SE helping is off looking for a solution to this problem
>which I would have a standard solution. Does anyone have any ideas I can
>toss at the SE to help him find the solution? If not I would imagine the
>GRF would be inherently broken and we bought the wrong box....thanks.
Not sure what you mean. The GRF doesn't have T1 interfaces. If you are
using FR over HSSI into a CSU that supports T1, then I still wouldn't see
what the problem is?
Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: