Re: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048 (fwd)

To: ascend-users@bungi.com (Ascend Users)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048 (fwd)
From: MegaZone <megazone@megazone.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 11:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Organization: WPI Discordian Society, Undocumented Cabal of the Accursed Saint Shiranto Joe
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Once upon a time Joe Pautler shaped the electrons to say...
>Sure you do... you lose the broadcast address for each subnet.

Only if they are independent.  The discussion was on having a /28 and /27
used to cover an IP pool.  And the poster indicated that you'd lose the
first and last IPs of the pool, as well as 2 in the middle.  That is not
the case.  All kinds of NASes - MAXen, PM-3s, etc - do this all the time.

You do not lose IPs with each fragment updated in OSPF and VLSM.

-MZ
--
<URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, author, webmaster, human being, me
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 781-788-0130
<URL:mailto:megazone@gweep.net> <URL:http://www.megazone.org/> Hail Discordia!
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Call Reference Number
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Diagnostic Commands
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) IP Addresses needed for 4048 (fwd)
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Call Reference Number
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread