Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??

To: Joseph@austintx.net (Joseph Bridgewater)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 20:01:18 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <19980929185910203.AAA262@ws40>
References: <199809291758.KAA28886><2.2.32.19980929131006.0174ab2c@pop.lyceum.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 01:59 PM 9/29/98 -0500, Joseph Bridgewater wrote:
>Are the optional symbol rates implemented in the Rockwell code for the
>Maxen?  Will they allow them to be negotiated by a calling modem?

The optional symbol rate for 33.6 is 3429 and is apparently not implemented
by any modem DSP vendor. Like I said earlier, this seems to be the result
of the standards process, interoperability and the complexity of the whole
mess that the industry calls high-speed modems.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??

From: Kevin A Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??

From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??

From: Joseph@austintx.net (Joseph Bridgewater)

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 analog on-hook delay
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Pipeline 75 analog on-hook delay
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread