Re: (ASCEND) Ascend being stingy? Fan cutt-backs?

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

> >hmm. (Always in my mind more Fan's = good)
> 
> In reality what is more important is the CFM (or cubic metres per whatever)
> ...
> and the airflow path.

The most important issue to me will be the delta of heat rise across
the chassis, Chassis w/ extra fans and chassis minus the two fans. 

I'm going to do some inhouse testing soon to see if there is a difference 
in the real world :)

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations / Network Access
Erols Internet (An RCN Company)

> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Ascend being stingy? Fan cutt-backs?
• From: "R. P. McCormick" <RPM@GCQ.net>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Clients using static IP Addresses
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend being stingy? Fan cutt-backs?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend being stingy? Fan cutt-backs?
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) radius user file
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread