Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) Cisco-MAX connection problems



Hi
We had the same problem with 2503
The solution is using of CHAP
In Ascend you should make profile for connection with the Name that is
described in cisco Chap alternative hostname on Bri0.

Best Regards,

Igor Tarasenko
System Engineer
INFOCOM GmbH
10 Volodymyrska St.,
Ukraine, Kiev, 252025
tel:+380 44 245 1822
fax:+380 44 228 7340
E-Mail: itarasen@ukrpack.net
X.400:g=Igor;s=Tarasenko;o=INFOCOM;a=Ukrmail;c=UA
http://www.ukrpack.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Neale Banks <neale@idesign.com.au>
To: ascend-users@bungi.com <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 11:58 AM
Subject: (ASCEND) Cisco-MAX connection problems


>Greetings,
>
>We are trying to get a Cisco 1003 to connect to a max4000 and having no
>progress in the LCP negotiation department.  The MAX is logging the calls
as
>disconnected due to c=41 (PPP - LCP Negotiation failed) and p=77 (LCP State
>Ack Sent).
>
>On the Cisco side, "debug ppp neg" gives us:
>
>---------------------------8<------------------------------------
>BR0:1 PPP: Phase is DOWN
>%LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
>BR0:1 PPP: Treating connection as a callout
>BR0:1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open
>BR0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out
>BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 163 len 25
>BR0:1 LCP:    MagicNumber 0x34F7E5B8 (0x050634F7E5B8)
>BR0:1 LCP:    MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4)
>BR0:1 LCP:    EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x130B016F6D6E6963616C6C)
>BR0:1 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 29
>BR0:1 LCP:    VendorSpecific OUI 0x000001 (0x00040000)
>BR0:1 LCP:    MRU 1524 (0x010405F4)
>BR0:1 LCP:    AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023)
>BR0:1 LCP:    MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4)
>BR0:1 LCP:    EndpointDisc 3 00c0.7b71.f87b (0x13090300C07B71F87B)
>BR0:1 LCP: O CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 12
>BR0:1 LCP:    VendorSpecific OUI 0x000003 (0x00040000)
>BR0:1 LCP:    AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023)
>BR0:1 LCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 163 len 25
>BR0:1 LCP:    MagicNumber 0x34F7E5B8 (0x050634F7E5B8)
>BR0:1 LCP:    MRRU 1524 (0x110405F4)
>BR0:1 LCP:    EndpointDisc 1 Local (0x130B016F6D6E6963616C6C)
>BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 4
>BR0:1 LCP: O TERMACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 4
>BR0:1 PPP: No remote authentication for call-out
>BR0:1 LCP: TIMEout: Time = 0x247CECCC State = REQsent
>---------------------------8<------------------------------------
>
>Which suggests there is something the Cisco and the MAX don't like in the
>LCP negotiation phase (possibly in the attempt to negotiate PAP?).
>
>In the Cisco configuration, we have (amongst other things ;-):
>
>---------------------------8<------------------------------------
>version 11.3
>no service pad
>no service password-encryption
>[...]
>username <profile-name> password 0 <pap-recv-passwd>
>[...]
>interface BRI0
> ip unnumbered Ethernet0
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer idle-timeout 604800
> dialer map ip <IP of MAX> name MAX1 <phn# of MAX>
> dialer load-threshold 224 either
> dialer-group 1
> ppp authentication pap callin
> ppp multilink
>---------------------------8<------------------------------------
>
>On the MAX side, we have Ans/PPP/Recv Auth=PAP and Profile/name/Encaps=MPP
>(which worked just fine with a P50 that was not using PAP auth with this
>router).
>
>Any idea what we have overlooked?
>
>Thanks,
>Neale.
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>