Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Another Test: MAX6000
haha, You absolutley correct, I think I'm going to start the Nealis
Report, I'll charge like 100,000.00 dollars, and who ever gives me
the most money will win hands down each time :), Either that or
a case a beer would work :)
Jason Nealis
On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 wmoniz@aracnet.net wrote:
>
> Exactly. This is the case in every corner of the market. How the heck
> would we ever get unbiased reports without list like these? :)
>
> Bill Moniz
> AracNet.
>
> > But, Let's be honest, Do these report actually hold any truth, It seems
> > each vendor will come out with it's own report from foo.com showing it's
> > box kicking much ass. Honestly if we the customers made decisions based
> > on these reports we would be switching vendors about twice a week.
> >
> >
> > Jason Nealis
> > Director Internet Operations
> > Network Access
> > Erols Internet
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 1998, Ales Kriznik wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Bay's Versalar 5399 tops remote-access field, says Network World
> > > Summary:
> > > An article in the 3/23/98 issue of Network World, has shown that the
> > > Versalar 5399 RAC has topped the field of five in its testing of Remote
> > > Access products. The Versalar 5000, outfitted with the Versalar 5399
> > > Remote Access Concentrator (RAC) Module aced the performance tests, turning
> > > in the best throughput numbers.
> > > Tests were conducted using 60 Windows 95-based PCs, each of which tapped
> > > its own 33.6 Kbit/sec modem to transfer files to and from a Windows NT
> > > 4.0-based server via the RAS unit being tested. After all 60 clients
> > > dialed-in and connected, the test started with a single node transferring
> > > files, increasing to two nodes transferring files at once and so on. If no
> > > calls were dropped, then the test was repeated three times and an average
> > > throughput figure was calculated for uploads and downloads as measured at
> > > each client. If calls were dropped, each vendor had a chance to diagnose
> > > the problem and apply fixes. If the fixes didn't work, then the average of
> > > the three best test runs were calculated, as was the case for Ascend and
> > > Shiva.
> > > Upload rates were higher than download rates, which is a common phenonmenon
> > > in this type of test.
> > > Bay finished first-
> > > Number 1: Bay Networks Versalar 5399 RAC
> > > average upload throughput- 99.1 Kbit/sec
> > > average download throughput- 67.8 Kbit/sec
> > > Others participating in the test and the order in which they finished, were:
> > > 2: Compaq's Microcom 6200 Remote Access Concentrator
> > > average upload throughput- 73.2 Kbit/sec
> > > average download throughput- 51.3 Kbit/sec
> > > 3: 3Com's Total Control HiPer Access System/EdgeServer Pro Module
> > > average upload throughput- 73.3 Kbit/sec
> > > average download throughput- 34.2 Kbit/sec
> > > 4: Ascend's MAX 6000
> > > average upload throughput- 73.4 Kbit/sec*
> > > average download throughput- 35.1 Kbit/sec*
> > > *note- Ascend placed fourth because its box was experiencing problems and
> > > could not complete the test. The throughput stats for Ascend are based on
> > > 59 simultaneous clients.
> > > 5: Shiva's LanRover Access Switch
> > > average upload throughput- 74.2 Kbit/sec**
> > > average download throughput- 52.5 Kbit/sec**
> > > **note- Shiva placed last because it was dropping calls once it hit 22
> > > simultaneous clients. The throughput stats for Shiva are based on 22
> > > simultaneous clients.
> > > Cisco, a key player in this market, was also invited. But Cisco said they
> > > couldn't free up a technician during the timespan that the tests were given
> > > and consequently declined to participate.
> > > If you want to see the original article, you have to access Network World's
> > > website http://www.nwfusion.com , as a registered user. You can register
> > > with them online (its free).
> > > If you are a Network World registered user and would also like to see the
> > > original article, then click on the URL below:
> > > http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/0323review.html
> > >
> > >
> > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> > >
> >
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: