Re: (ASCEND) ISDN w/o PRI?

To: wparker@accessvt.com (Wes Parker)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) ISDN w/o PRI?
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@xcom.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 09:19:09 -0500 (EST)
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <003601bd515f$bed4c500$14fc90d0@wcvt.com.DHMC> from "Wes Parker" at Mar 16, 98 08:46:56 pm
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> 
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0032_01BD511C.A8C5A060
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> We have a Max4004 with 3 channelized T1's for our 56k modems.  We now =
> want to try beta testing ISDN dialup users, but were told by Ascend tech =
> support that we had to provision PRI instead of the T1's.     Is this in =
> absolute requirement, or is only  Ascend's recommended configuration?
> 
> Appreciate your advice.

You can't do ISDN on T1's directly to the box. A protocol
conversion would have to occur somewhere.   


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) ISDN w/o PRI?

From: "Wes Parker" <wparker@accessvt.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) User not receiving IP address.
Next by Date: (ASCEND) R binaries
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) ISDN w/o PRI?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Packet filter for port 9 attack
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread