Re: (ASCEND) Rip or Proxy Arp for multiple Max

["Leon McCalla" <ascend@caribbeanlink.com>]

I've been using Proxy Arp for over a year accross 6 Terms servers and I'm
considering either Rip or OSPF because of arp cache problems. If a user
disconnects then calls another box it takes a few mins sometimes for the
ciscos (and perhaps others) to recognize the new proxy arps.


Leon McCalla

> -----Original Message-----
> I am about to install a second Max 40xx on our network
> - Incoming calls will arrive indifferently on the first or on the second =
> Max (the 2 Maxen will share the same call number)
> - For dynamicaly assigned IP addresses, each Max will use its own pool
> - For users with fixed IP addresses, adresses and subnet masks are =
> assigned from Radius profiles
>
> My question is : what is the best solution to route users with fixed IP =
> addresses : Proxy Arp or Rip ?
> (I do want to go into all the problems related to OSPF ...)
>


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) ISDN signaling not enable on unit..???? and pipeline50-max4048
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) RADIUS: Changes between primary and secondary and vice-versa.
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Rip or Proxy Arp for multiple Max
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) rev 6 for Pipe 25?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread