Re: (ASCEND) 4000 Series Underpowered?

To: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 4000 Series Underpowered?
From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 14:46:58 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199807081806.OAA09656@Iodine.Mlink.NET>
References: <Your message of "Wed, 08 Jul 1998 09:47:19 EDT." <3.0.5.32.19980708094719.00961770@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 02:06 PM 7/8/98 -0400, Phillip Vandry wrote:
>> It's much like the Intel progression of x86 chips....just a few years
ago the 
>> 486 seemed like a Turbo engine compared to the prevalent 286 and 386
>> machines. 
>> Now Pentium II makes it feel like an old chugger....
>
>Ah, I see.
>
>As time goes on it is larger, includes more hacks, runs hotter, and
>occasionally has bugs due to the overwhelming hardware complexity!

...costs more, and sells more too...


Kevin Smith			Ascend Communications...
Customer Satisfaction	...where Network Solutions never end.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 4000 Series Underpowered?

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Re: 4000 Series Underpowered?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) digital modems
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 4000 Series Underpowered?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 4000 Series Underpowered?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread