Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

At 15:08 09/23/1997 -0700, Kevin Smith wrote:
>At 12:06 PM 9/20/97 +0800, Stanley Chan wrote:
>>"We recommend you restrict IP addresses used on the local LAN so that
>>hosts on the network connecting to the pipeline have each octet of 
>>their IP addresses greater than 99 (this only applies to FTP sessions).
>>For example, 192.168.121.101 is recommended address, but 192.168.121.
>>99 is not."

>That was an old limitation in the NAT implementation. It has long since
>been "resolved" and no longer required. Which version are you running

support for NAT octets <100 when using FTP was added in 5.0ai13,
should be in 5.1a as well... (but NOT in 5.0B for new p50/p75)

-Jim H
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Can a p130 handle a full t1?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP - ports keep moving
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NAT on ftp sessions
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Max4000 can't see Cisco 3620 with RIP
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread