Re: (ASCEND) Ap23 gone?

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Ap23 gone?
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 1997 14:32:21 -0700
Cc: "(ML) Ascend Users" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970908233606.4077D-100000@babylon.erols.com>
References: <199709081850.TAA22245@diamond.xara.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 11:44 PM 9/8/97 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
> Wouldn't you know it, I plug a release and it get's pulled, To be honest
>I'm quite peeved. The modem code in that release is exactley what you 
>and just about everyone else that is deploying K56 is looking for. I
>didn't pay much attention to the radius issues cause frankly, All we
>do with radius logs is use them to track abuse. (I just grep'd out for
>Modem 4 and etc in the User name field) So that's my bad for not seeing 
>that.

After a quick review of the extent of the RADIUS problem, it has been
deemed appropriate to put Ap23 back on the FTP server per:

>A number of customers have installed 5.0Ap23 and although they experienced
>the problem with Radius Accounting (bogus Framed-Address) they are still
running
>that software because of significant improvements in other areas of the code
>(particularly the latest Rockwell code).  Because of this,  Customer
Service has 
>decided to place 5.0Ap23 back on the FTP server.   TAC will update the
README  
>file for this release to inform customers about the current problem with
Accounting
>
>Willie Meagher
>MAX Escalation Group
>

Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Ap23 gone?

From: "Alex.Bligh" <amb@xara.net>

Re: (ASCEND) Ap23 gone?

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Patch 5.0ap23?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) reality check!
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Ap23 gone?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) FR problems
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread