(ASCEND) stuffy code releases

[ascend@digistar.com]

On Tue, 9 Sep 1997, Dave Van Allen wrote:

> Hopefully, with the eventual release of p24, along with some of the OSPF
> work we did out there, a very near release of the Max code will offer
> stability and functionality while still being a long way ahead of the
> competition.

This is bullshit.  If Ascend wants to release code for people to use, let
EVERYBODY have a crack at it, not hand-picked people to sit and tantalize
the lower minions.  To sit here and read about one or two people talking
about their experiences and how "the rest of you can wait until we've
finished toying with you" is petty. 

Release the damned code, or keep your alpha/beta testers QUIET about it.


Regards,
Jason.

--
   ____   .      .     __
  / __ \__ ___ __ ___ / /____ _____  jsb@digistar.com        Jason S. Buchanan
 / /_/ / / // / /(_-</ __/ _ `/ __/  Springfield, MO     Digistar MicroSystems
/_____/_/\_, /_/\___/\__/\_,_/_/     KA0MNX      http://www.digistar.com/~jsb/
        /___/                        IRC-Op irc@Springfield.MO.US.undernet.org
                                     UNIX/NT Systems and Network Administrator
                                     voice: 417-865-2480     fax: 417-865-1243

              one net to rule them all, one net to find them,
            one net to bring them all, using Unix to bind them.


                         http://www.eelsauce.com

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) reality check!
• From: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MP+/twin analog
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) DOVBS?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) reality check!
• Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) stuffy code releases
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread