Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines

[Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>]

At 04:47 PM 8/27/97 -0500, Jake Messinger wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Jim Howard wrote:
>
>> probably because they (p50/p75) are both identical in hardware,
>> and just the 75 has a "hash code" to enable the POTS ports.
>
>Aside from the fact that the pots ports do not physcially exist on the 50.

Actually they do now. One box, two products separated by hash code.

Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>
• Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Pipeline 50/Telnet
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) version 5.0B of pipelines
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread