Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products

To: John Coy <jcoy@arkansas.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 19:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NL.net>, ascend-users@max.bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970826102207.00a7f7a0@mail.arkansas.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com


 I believe you only see the behavior if you have a particular radius
setting if regards to immediate actions. For just a stock setting I  
don't believe you will be affected.

Jason Nealis


On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, John Coy wrote:

> At 03:03 PM 8/26/97 +0200, you wrote:
> >
> >    What were the accounting problems?
> >    
> >    Did I miss something?
> >    
> >Yes, you apparently missed numerous reports on this list that the
> >radius accounting replaces the User-Name by whatever "Modem n:n" the
> >user is using.
> >
> I am not seeing this behavior on our RADIUS accounting logs.  Is
> there a particular load that is affected.  I'm using the tk.m40
> for both my Max4000s and Max4004s.  It works fine.  I am not using
> OSPF but rather RIPv2 as a routing protocol.
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products

From: John Coy <jcoy@arkansas.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) OSPF question
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Warning: RADIUS accounting and 5.0Ap20
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread