Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Disconnect-Cause 185
At 17:59 08/25/1997 +0700, Joseph Bridgewater wrote:
>At 03:14 PM 8/25/97 -0700, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>If they are being "hit" randomly, I would ask Telco if they changed anything
>>(of course they didn't, but it could lead to something...). Do all channels
>>eventually seem to be getting used ?
>Seems like in the past, the Telco people said our device chooses which
>channels to use. In any case, the funny thing is that immediately before
>the p20 upgrade, it did go from 23 -> 1, and immediately after, it's like
>23->19, 15->12, 9->7, 11, 5, 18, 4... I'm certain the PRI wasn't
>reconfigured co-incident with our sw upgrade. I did mention the behavior
This sounds exactly like what the telcos usually call
"most idle" call offering, so that the next call goes over
whichever channel has not been used for the longest time.
It was designed for things like tele-marketer operations,
where you want all sales people to get mostly equal number of calls,
and also works well in NAS systems that have a direct 1-to-1
relationship between the channel number and the modems.
Now as to why this happened after your upgrade, I am sans clue.
-Jim H
----
Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>