Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75

     Then what I outlined below is the problem you are experiencing.  
     We ran into this limitation a few months ago.  Depending on your 
     network layout and how and where you filter SAP traffic, the SAP 
     Proxy feature may work for you.  Take a look at the release 
     notes.  Otherwise stick with bridging.
     
     Dean Heltemes


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author:  MMedwid (MMedwid@symantec.com) at hdqt-unix-mime
Date:    8/14/97 6:44 PM


     Yes - we have over 300 Netware servers on the network.  
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author:  Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com at Internet 
Date:    8/14/97 2:32 PM
     
     
     Do you have more than 300 NetWare servers on your network?  If so, the 
     Pipeline can only hold 300 SAP entries and 300 IPX routes.  If the 
     routes for those six servers don't happen to fall within the first 
     300, that's your problem.
     
     You could also try the SAP Proxy feature, depending on your network 
     layout.
     
     Dean Heltemes
     
     
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Author:  owner-ascend-users (owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com) at hdqt-unix-mime
Date:    8/13/97 7:15 PM
     
     
     When using bridging on the Pipeline 75, I can get to any netware 
     server - attach, browse, download, upload.  No problem.  But since we 
     changed to the IPX routing, I have found about six Netware server 
     (bindery) that I can not attach to nor browse volumes.  I can 
     attach/log on to any other server on our network.  I get an error 
     message "An attempt made to establish session to a network server 
     failed.  Possibly a problem of not enough available connections."  I 
     checked nlist and there are always at least 50 available connections.  
     Plus if I go to a P75 with the bridged config, I can attach etc no 
     problem to any server.  
     
     
     Any ideas?
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com 
To get FAQ'd:   <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
     

Received: from Mailer.symantec.com (198.6.49.5) by smtp-ima.symantec.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise) id 0009FF24; Thu, 14 Aug 97 12:38:15
-0700
Received: from cargill.com (charon.cargill.com [167.136.225.225]) by
Mailer.symantec.com (8.8.4/8.7.6) with ESMTP id MAA21005 for
<MMedwid@symantec.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dean_Heltemes@cargill.com
Received: (from root@localhost) by cargill.com (8.8.2/8.8.0) id OAA22066; Thu,
14 Aug 1997 14:33:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hdqt.cargill.com(157.239.110.12) by charon.cargill.com via smap
(V1.3mjr)
	id sma021965; Thu Aug 14 13:32:44 1997
Received: from  by hdqt.cargill.com with SMTP
	(1.37.109.20/16.2) id AA269227163; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 14:32:43 -0500
X-Openmail-Hops: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 14:32:15 -0500
Message-Id: <H000072718ff9377@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <0009D710.3152@symantec.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Netware Server/Routed IPX on P75
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: MMedwid@symantec.com, owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="(ASCEND)"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit