Re: (ASCEND) MAX Upgrade Problem - Help

To: kevin@ascend.com (Kevin Smith)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) MAX Upgrade Problem - Help
From: "David Langford" <langfod@dihelix.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 10:33:21 -1000 (HST)
Cc: dfisher@eagle.lhup.edu, haag@centaur.de, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970804122608.00bcb5d8@mktg_srv.ascend.com> from Kevin Smith at "Aug 4, 97 12:26:08 pm"
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Is there any reason then that to the end-user Ascend seems to prefer
the console method. I mean that it is the only upgrade method
listed in to patch documention. 


-David Langford
 langfod@dihelix.com

>In this case, the customer used the Xmodem/console port method to
>do the upgrade. That method blows away the whole configuration. It's
>designed that way. To recover the config., we recommend saving it
>and then re-loading, but it should be noted that the console method
>for saving the config (by default) does not save passwords....
>
>TFTP methods save everything. TFTP upgrade has been designed to avoid
>losing configurations, and any case where something is lost should
>be reported to "support@ascend.com" with as much detail as possible.
>
>
>Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) K56 Flex "Burp Tone"
Next by Date: (ASCEND) PM3 vs. MAX 4048 (fwd)
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread