RE: (ASCEND) BGP?

To: Joseph Hickman <josephh@psn.net>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) BGP?
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 1997 11:47:26 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.970731163202.8378C-100000@saturn.psn.net>
References: <3.0.3.32.19970731135411.00c51ce4@darla>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 04:32 PM 7/31/97 -0700, Joseph Hickman wrote:
>	Any idea with the TNTs will support BGP as advertised?

AFAIK, a date hasn't been set. However, I would like to see some direction
from the user community regarding what to implement. What optional
attributes (if any) of BGP would you feel we must support? We support them
all on the GRF, but it is a huge amount of code which may lead to very
complex configurations.

Or should we just do the minimum so folks can have feeds to two AS's.

Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

RE: (ASCEND) BGP?

From: Craig Salmond <salmond@unix.cde.com>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) GRF port to port performance?

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

RE: (ASCEND) GRF port to port performance?

From: Joseph Hickman <josephh@psn.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MAX Upgrade Problem - Help
Next by Date: (ASCEND) k56Flex Camera Ready Art
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) GRF port to port performance?
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) BGP?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread