On 01/10 01:23 , Kristopher Browne wrote: > I was at a Usenix conference in 2002 and then 2003... what I could see then is that the percentage of Linux laptops vs PowerBooks flipped in pretty much one year. > > In '02 it was about 50% there using windows, 40% some kind of Linux (some of it on Apple hardware) and 10% Mac OSX. > > In '03 I'd have said it was about the same for Windows, but 30% Macs with Mac OSX and the remaining 20% Linux. > > That trend seems to have mostly continued. Looking back, I think one of the limiting factors is that Linux desktop environments have not gotten any better since about that early-00s time period. They've gotten *different*, but not necessarily *better*. I've been doing Linux on the desktop for about 17 years at this point, and while there are now many more applications, and those applications are more functional, the usability and configurability of the base environment is little better than it was 10 years ago. Even if you can get past the UI differences (GNOME I'm looking at you), things as seemingly basic as changing the display resolution are difficult or impossible to find. It's not apparent to most users that there are two major different desktop environments (GNOME and KDE), and each has its *own* control panels. Then there's limitations like an inability to change the width of scrollbars, wierd semi-popup scrollbars like GNOME uses (which are hard to grab), different scrollbars between applications, undesireable inconsistencies in adherence to chosen color schemes (on one application a non-default background color works fine because you can change the text color, on another application the text color doesn't change which makes the text unreadable), etc. I accept that different widget sets will be with us for a long time to come. However, it would be nice if some effort was put into at least making a common format/method/interface for setting colors. So both GNOME and KDE widgets would use a common set of colors between them. -- Carl Soderstrom Systems Administrator Real-Time Enterprises www.real-time.com