Thanks Brian, I just really don't want to be "that guy" :)

linda

On 2/27/14, 2:47 PM, Brian Dolan-Goecke wrote:
> Linda,
>
> I don't speak for the list, but I think it is perfectly fine if you 
> promote your business a little on the list.
>
> You have contributed to the list, and the group, so I believe you have 
> earned the right to promote yourself a little.  (I think we could even 
> arrange to plug your business a little on the Penguins Unbound website 
> if you like, being you have contributed.)
>
> I think that is only fair if you are willing to come and share your 
> knowledge and expertise with the group.
>
> Thanks again for taking part in the group (both the email list and the 
> Penguinsunbound meetings!).
>
> ==>brian.
>
> On 02/27/2014 01:05 PM, Linda Kateley wrote:
>> I really hate to plug my business on a list, but this is what i do. I
>> teach classes on zfs. If anyone is interested I thought I would put it
>> out there...
>>
>> kateleyco.com
>>
>> Most of the work I do is for a bunch of smallish zfs startups. I am
>> actually creating freenas content right now.
>>
>> The reason I was hesitant on saying something definitive is I hadn't
>> checked the news yet today. There can always be news. In april of last
>> year Oracle reapplied for trademark on the word zfs. I have been waiting
>> for them to do something with that :)
>>
>> linda
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/14, 12:48 PM, T L wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry that I was so terse this morning.
>>>
>>> OpenZFS, per se, is newer than the Oracle acquisition of Sun.
>>>
>>> There are many ZFS trees, these days. (And, in this era of distributed
>>> source control, that's not a big deal anyway. )
>>>
>>> Each of FreeBSD, ZFS on Linux, et al, have their own trees. OpenZFS
>>> isn't code -- its an umbrella organization to promote common
>>> development across the open source implementations of ZFS.
>>>
>>> There have been two recent Ars Technica articles on ZFS and btrfs that
>>> are well worth reading if you're interested in this space. (Even the
>>> comments are valuable, believe it or not!)
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> On Feb 27, 2014 9:46 AM, "Seth Miller" <sethmiller.sm at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:sethmiller.sm at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Thomas,
>>>
>>>     You are correct. OpenZFS is open source among ports. ZFS is not.
>>>
>>>     It may be just a matter of semantics. When Oracle acquired Sun, it
>>>     locked down Solaris and everything that belongs to it, including
>>>     ZFS. OpenZFS was developed as part of OpenSolaris which is now
>>>     discontinued.
>>>
>>>     What I should have said is Solaris ZFS is no longer open source
>>>     which is irrelevant in this case so I stand corrected.
>>>
>>>     Seth
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:31 AM, T L <tlunde at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:tlunde at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Seth -
>>>
>>>         You are mistaken. See OpenZFS.
>>>
>>>         They may be able to develop a proprietary fork, but you can't
>>>         put the genie back in a bottle.
>>>
>>>         Thomas
>>>
>>>         On Feb 27, 2014 12:35 AM, "Seth Miller"
>>>         <sethmiller.sm at gmail.com <mailto:sethmiller.sm at gmail.com>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Nice job Kateley.
>>>
>>>             Keep in mind that ZFS is no longer open source since
>>>             Oracle locked it down.
>>>
>>>             Seth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:51 PM, B-o-B De Mars
>>>             <mr.chew.baka at gmail.com <mailto:mr.chew.baka at gmail.com>>
>>>             wrote:
>>>
>>>                 On 2/10/2014 2:31 PM, Linda Kateley wrote::
>>>
>>>                     So I am starting to create some small videos. I
>>>                     just posted one that is
>>>                     10 minutes to Time Machine. If anyone has a
>>>                     second(or 10 minutes), maybe
>>>                     take a peak? Give me only positive feedback :) my
>>>                     ego is way too fragile
>>>                     for negative (again Smiley face).
>>>
>>>                     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2pyYeANGKc
>>>
>>>                     The content is probably way to simple for this
>>>                     crowd, but i thought i
>>>                     would throw it out here..
>>>
>>>
>>>                 Very Nice video Linda!
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>                 TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>>>                 tclug-list at mn-linux.org 
>>> <mailto:tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>>>             tclug-list at mn-linux.org <mailto:tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>>>         tclug-list at mn-linux.org <mailto:tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>>>     tclug-list at mn-linux.org <mailto:tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
>>>     http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
>> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
>> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list