> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Accidental copy was:Re:  tclug-list Digest, Vol 101, Issue 21
>       (Erik Anderson)
>    2. replying to digests one time too many (Mike Miller)
>    3. Re: replying to digests one time too many (Erik Mitchell)
>    4. Re: worst Linux/UNIX command line mistake, ever (elhaddi)
>    5. Re: replying to digests one time too many (Chuck Cole)
>    6. Re: replying to digests one time too many (gregrwm)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 17:01:24 -0500
> From: Erik Anderson <erikerik at gmail.com>
> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
> Subject: [tclug-list] Accidental copy was:Re:  tclug-list Digest, Vol
> 	101, Issue 21
> Message-ID:
> 	<CADdM08odRPOpRTA=9-9Ff7MZNzHhY4orQHPxzAMRfcL9jfiDLg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Paul graf <pj.world at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I am a noober but what my mistake here at home was copy an openSUSE12.3
> > iso image to my primary harddisk instead of the thumb drive which was
> > intended.
> 
> 
> Paul, ***please*** read this and take my advice.
> 
> Good mailing list etiquette requires that you do the following things:
> 
> 1. If you insist on remaining subscribed to the list digest (it baffles me
> why you would do so), **please** strip out the irrelevant portions of the
> message, only leaving the specific bits of text that you are responding to.
> 
> 2. Edit the subject line! How meaningful is this subject line to you:
> 
>  [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol 101, Issue 21
> 
> Not very, is it. Edit the subject and make it meaningful. This not only
> makes list discussions much easier to track, but it also makes the list
> archives much more useful.
> 
> So - others have mentioned this many times and you've apparently ignored
> the advice, but I'll try again - go here, sign in, and change "Digest Mode"
> to "off". This way, you'll get separate emails, delivered immediately,
> instead of a single daily digest.
> 
> -Erik
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20130518/cd1ec921/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 17:26:22 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Mike Miller <mbmiller+l at gmail.com>
> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
> Subject: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many
> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1305181719280.26110 at taxa.psych.umn.edu>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:
> 
> [one entire digest deleted here]
> 
> Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us?  It's getting to the point where I 
> think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to deal with this 
> kind of nonsense.  Several of us have taken the time, more than once each, 
> to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of our efforts have 
> had any effect on him.  I don't think he has sent a message to the list 
> that didn't have a subject line of this form:
> 
> Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+
> 
> It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I would happily 
> correspond with him under better conditions..
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 18:21:34 -0500
> From: Erik Mitchell <erik.mitchell at gmail.com>
> To: TCLUG Mailing List <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many
> Message-ID:
> 	<CANNReEFTMNdtG_1Ytd8hF5-LA7p+FDHxsSKJ4gtcmLn1DEr2gg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Why don't we do away with digest mode, and just move everyone who has
> made that selection over to the normal mode?
> 
> -Erik
> 
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mike Miller <mbmiller+l at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:
> >
> > [one entire digest deleted here]
> >
> > Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us?  It's getting to the point where I
> > think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to deal with this
> > kind of nonsense.  Several of us have taken the time, more than once each,
> > to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of our efforts have
> > had any effect on him.  I don't think he has sent a message to the list that
> > didn't have a subject line of this form:
> >
> > Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+
> >
> > It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I would happily
> > correspond with him under better conditions..
> >
> > Mike
> > _______________________________________________
> > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Erik K. Mitchell
> erik.mitchell at gmail.com

> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 04:45:19 -0500
> From: "Chuck Cole" <cncole at earthlink.net>
> To: "'TCLUG Mailing List'" <tclug-list at mn-linux.org>
> Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many
> Message-ID: <6B38DAB422E54A0D8B42522F267E6974 at d830a>
> 
> +1 (repeated!)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org
> > [mailto:tclug-list-bounces at mn-linux.org] On Behalf Of Erik Mitchell
> > Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 6:22 PM
> > To: TCLUG Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [tclug-list] replying to digests one time too many
> >
> > Why don't we do away with digest mode, and just move everyone who has
> > made that selection over to the normal mode?
> >
> > -Erik
> >
> > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Mike Miller
> > <mbmiller+l at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 May 2013, Paul graf wrote:
> > >
> > > [one entire digest deleted here]
> > >
> > > Is Paul Graf just trying to torture us?  It's getting to
> > the point where I
> > > think it might be wiser to drop him from the list than to
> > deal with this
> > > kind of nonsense.  Several of us have taken the time, more
> > than once each,
> > > to explain it to him, but I see no indication that all of
> > our efforts have
> > > had any effect on him.  I don't think he has sent a message
> > to the list that
> > > didn't have a subject line of this form:
> > >
> > > Re: [tclug-list] tclug-list Digest, Vol \d+, Issue \d+
> > >
> > > It's too bad because he seems interested in Linux and I
> > would happily
> > > correspond with him under better conditions..
> > >
> > > Mike
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
> > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list> *******************************************

I just want to apologize to everyone! I have turned digest mode off now. I am not trying to torture anyone. Is this better now because I have been confused as to how to properly respond to messages since I signed up. Sorry
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20130519/1bceddd7/attachment.html>