On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Yaron wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Chuck Cole wrote:
>
>> Almost true, but Yaron didn't believe CDMA is a majority of carriers 
>> and likely also in users in the USA.
>
> Oh for goodness sake. I NEVER SAID THAT. I said GSM is undoubtebly the 
> most popular system GLOBALLY. I /specifically/ said that the US is 
> LAGGING BEHIND most of the world BECAUSE CDMA is the most popular system 
> here.

That's what I was seeing -- Yaron did say that.  The one point that I 
thought you actually were disagreeing about was whether a Sprint CDMA 
phone could be used on another CDMA network.  Yaron said that it could 
not, and I think he was right.


> We're getting WAY the heck off topic here, but I'll say this.

I don't know -- we are interested in using Linux systems, like Android on 
phones that give us internet access.  How we can get that access for our 
Linux devices is pretty important and I think worthy of our attention. 
This will be even more true in a few years.


> CDMA is an old, old, old and outdated technology. It is missing alot of 
> features GSM does, notably that you can't use voice and data at the same 
> time with CDMA.

Interesting that I didn't notice that during the 9 years or so that I was 
using my Sprint phones.  I would have sworn that the old Treo 600 was able 
to do it, though that was pre-EVDO and I'm not sure what it had.  I guess 
current Sprint can do voice and WiFi at the same time, though, which might 
be why I didn't notice it.


> Furthermore, CDMA is a lot better for locking users into a specific 
> carrier. It is virtually unknown of to be able to take a CDMA phone to a 
> different provider - try taking a Verizon phone to Sprint, for example. 
> Good luck with that. If you buy an 'unlocked' CDMA phone you're still at 
> the mercy of your provider.
>
> Contrast this with an unlocked GSM phone. First, since GSM /is/ in use 
> globally, unlocked GSM phones are readily available. Google has been 
> directly selling unlocked GSM Nexus phones for ages, for example, and 
> you can get an unlocked GSM phone, not tied to any provider, on Amazon. 
> Easily.
>
> Once you have this phone, you can use it on any GSM network. In the 
> world. Without asking the provider for permission. You just put the SIM 
> card in.
>
> I have three unlocked GSM phones at home. If my primary phone breaks, I 
> can easily move my SIM to a backup phone. If I don't like my provider, I 
> have many more options to switch without having to buy a new phone than 
> if I was on a CDMA network.

That's another good argument for the superiority of GSM technology to CDMA 
technology, but...


> Now as for the quality of SERVICE, that's a completely different matter.
>
> I've been using T-Mobile for a loooong time, and I can tell you that the 
> quality of their service AND their customer service has gone downhill a 
> looong way. When Mike said he can't get data service in his home I was sadly 
> not surprised. I have a hrd time with that, too, as do some other t-mobile 
> people I know. This just started happening out of the blue a few years back, 
> and t-mobile claims it's "impossible". And don't get me started on their 
> customer service which used to be fantastic (it used to be the #1 rated 
> customer satisfaction provider! Not anymore...)
>
> This has nothing at all to do with underlying technology and, Chuck, I think 
> you misunderstood me completely if you thought that's what I'm saying. By all 
> means, use whatever network is best for you. I'd never advise you to do 
> otherwise.

Now I'm looking at the AT&T coverage maps and they seem to be claiming 
better coverage than T-Mobile.  Maybe that's accurate.  They say they have 
4G in Madison and all over the Twin Cities.  It looks like they go to a 
partner between Eau Claire County and Wisconsin Dells, both for voice and 
data, and data drops to 2G, but I could live with that.

http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/#?type=data&lat=44.05586242675781&lon=-91.80553436279297&sci=4

It looks like their policy is that if you use 6MB or more of data from a 
partner in two consecutive months, AT&T reserves the right to terminate 
your service.  That's weird.  I guess that means they aren't charging for 
roaming.

Mike