On 02/14/2011 10:22 AM, Justin Krejci wrote: > Yep, this is why NAT is evil and bad in every way except for extending > the life of IPv4. I completely disagree with your claim, although I agree that this practice by ISPs is pretty bad. NAT is fantastic for keeping a closed network (e.g. a home router) from interacting with all the baddies out there. I love the control that NAT gives me for my own network. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 554 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20110214/1af28fda/attachment.pgp>