On Thu, March 4, 2010 10:33 am, Mike Miller wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jim Crumley wrote: > >> On Wed, March 3, 2010 6:25 pm, Mike Miller wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Jim Crumley wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:17:36PM -0600, Mike Miller wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, accidentally sending to list doesn't happen much now, but it will >>>> likely happen more if this change is made. >>> >>> More than never? And what are we going to see? I'm on a bunch of >>> lists that do Reply-To munging and we aren't having a problem. >> >> Yep. Never. Not once. <snip> > > OMG! The horrors. It happened twice in 2001 and then gain in 2003. > Let's review these errors starting with this one... That's what found in 5 minutes of googling. You said no one ever sent to the list by accident. I am sure that it has happened more recently as well, and I might have found those cases with better search terms (or a better memory. I agree that nothing horrifying happened in these cases, but by changing behavior we make these things problems more likely. <snip> > Anyway, again, I am not worried about the possibility that someone will > accidentally send a message to the list that was meant for someone else. > I am not convinced that many people accidentally reply to individuals and not to the list, and I don't see the harm if they do. Then you just have to resend. But we obviously disagree and are going around in circles. I see the writing on the wall. -- Jim Crumley |Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List (TCLUG) Ruthless Debian Zealot |http://www.mn-linux.org/ Never laugh at live dragons |