On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:11:48 -0600, "Chris G." <thoth.serath at gmail.com> wrote: > because we love this list. we all take care of each other, trading > equipment, ideas, solving problems.... How is that related to the website being updated? I normally wouldn't even bother to reply but I wanted to make it a point that you only replied to me instead of the list itself. Ironic on this thread, I guess I will set my own Reply-To from now on when posting here. :) -Jeremy > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy Olexa <jolexa at jolexa.net> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:03:32 -0600 (CST), Yaron <tclug at freakzilla.com> >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote: >> > >> >> I also have root access to the mailing list server, so if I wanted to >> be >> >> autocratic about it I could just make the change unilaterally. >> >> However, >> I >> >> think that would be rather irresponsible. >> > >> > Well, so far we've got quite a few people saying they'd like the >> > change, >> a >> > couple of people saying they don't need the change, and zero people >> saying >> > they're against it. >> >> I'm in favor of the change as well. But I didn't know it took such a >> large >> thread to make changes like this, ha. >> >> > >> >> I'd really like to see a webpoll done on this. I think we used to do >> such >> >> things on the www.tclug.org website, but that site is bit-rotted so >> badly >> >> it's pathetic. (If anyone has any interest in cleaning it up, please >> let >> >> me >> >> know). >> > >> > I think one of the problems we've got here is we're letting stuff like >> > that atrophy quite badly. >> >> There aren't even any TCLUG events/meetings so what is the point of an >> updated website? :) >> >> > >> > >> > -Yaron >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >> tclug-list at mn-linux.org >> http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >>