On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Justin Krejci wrote:
> I also don't see what is so bad about HTML mail in principal.
.,,.
,;;*;;;;,
.-'``;-');;.
/' .-. /*;;
.' \d \;; .;;;,
/ o ` \; ,__. ,;*;;;*;,
\__, _.__,' \_.-') __)--.;;;;;*;;;;,
`""`;;;\ /-')_) __) `\' ';;;;;;
;*;;; -') `)_) |\ | ;;;;*;
;;;;| `---` O | | ;;*;;;
*;*;\| O / ;;;;;*
;;;;;/| .-------\ / ;*;;;;;
;;;*;/ \ | '. (`. ;;;*;;;
;;;;;'. ; | ) \ | ;;;;;;
,;*;;;;\/ |. / /` | ';;;*;
;;;;;;/ |/ / /__/ ';;;
'*;;*/ | / | ;*;
`""""` `""""` ;'
In principle, I don't see what's wrong with ponies in e-mail, as well.
> Perhaps
> various composers/implementations would be better but the principal I think
> is very useful and effective and has made a lot of communication much easier
> (for good or ill) for more people using the internet.
Why?
> Using HTML email is a
> lot easier for people to communicate than plain.
How?
> People are not interested
> in
References?
Or at least do you have a compelling argument on why it works for you?
I have asked last month for real-world examples on how HTML e-mail is helping
people get the job done, have fun, whatever... And I got no positive answers.
I'm still waiting. I'm genuinely curious.
Cheers,
florin
--
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20100701/3a60d195/attachment.pgp