I have not looked into replication yet (will do now). If it was realtime that would be amazing, but daily would be sufficient. When you mention replication is a problem with a poor connection I was looking more into what would happen if it went down. The internet connection is a good one, but you never know what will happen. jason On 8/10/07, Brock Noland <brockn at gmail.com> wrote: > > At least with Mysql 4, replication is a hassle to "sync" when the > connection drops or a server crashes. If your expecting a someone > unreliable connection, I doubt that will work. > > How current does the remote location need to be? > > Brock > > On 8/10/07, Andrew Zbikowski <andyzib at gmail.com> wrote: > > Have you looked into MySQL Replication or Clustering? > > > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-intro.html > > > > http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-cluster.html > > > > > > -- > > Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://andy.zibnet.us > > SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue >0; > > 0 rows returned > > > > _______________________________________________ > > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > http://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.mn-linux.org/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20070810/25f03523/attachment.htm