-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

you've tossed all your x86 hardware?  you must have come to your senses 
and bought a mac.  congratulations!  welcome to an OS that doesn't piss 
your time and energies away and lets you solve the problems at hand.

oh, you were trolling, right.

On Feb 14, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:

> <feeding the troll>
>
> It's right up[down?] there with BeOS. Unfortunately I threw out all the
> hardware it supports 5 years ago.
>
> </feeding the troll>
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:06:51PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>> Has anybody on this list had a chance to evaluate NetBSD 2.0 on the 
>> x86
>> architecture?  I am curious to see FreeBSD in turmoil and NetBSD
>> exploding onto the scene.  I am especially curious to see the 
>> wonderful
>> performance improvements that they have reported.
>>
>> Thanks for any information you would like to share.  I am always
>> interested in performance benchmarks against Linux 2.6 and FreeBSD as 
>> well.

{snipped - misc. signatures}

- -- 
steve ulrich                       sulrich at botwerks.org
PGP: 8D0B 0EE9 E700 A6CF ABA7  AE5F 4FD4 07C9 133B FAFC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCESmlT9QHyRM7+vwRAq8aAJ0SLt1q5Ci/aZZ83bB8T/UBpmWRxgCgp/5x
Zmm+9w0e+mhlkUiqcORSJpQ=
=wxV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----