On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Mike Miller wrote:

> On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Brian Hurt wrote:
> 
> > Of course, I may be slightly cynical because the company I work at just 
> > lost a big sale because our embedded servers ran Linux and not Windows. 
> > It's an embedded server- what the eff do you care what OS it runs?  It 
> > works, what's the problem?
> 
> Good question.  Did they give a reason for that preference?  Don't we have 
> stats showing that Linux file servers are faster than Microsoft servers? 
> Isn't Linux more stable than Windows?

It's also cheaper (license fees?), and requires fewer resources (CPU, 
memory).  If you don't need hard real time gaurentees, it's a great 
embedded OS.  Which is why we use it.

Brian