Why would I run Linux to run m$ office? It would be easier to just run XP and m$ office. Sam. Tom Penney wrote: >On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 11:57, sk3tch wrote: > > > >> >>Can't you look at this as the positive it is? IBM is obviously >>putting a lot of focus on Linux as a desktop - no matter what THIS IS >>GOOD. >> >> > >I second that. "It doesn't run MS Office" is probably the single biggest >excuse the average joe uses for not giving linux a try. Sure Open office >is great but it is not MS Office. Like it or no MS office is what the >world uses and knows. MS Office is the first thing corporate America >trains people to use. MS Office running well on linux is good for linux, >even if I will never run in. > > > _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list