Perhaps the sarcasm was lost on you, the Cnet bandwidth tester is a load of crap. ftp to ftp.software.umn.edu and download something large, with a decent program (not internet explorer) that reports speeds. You're on the exact same node (or hub, as you like to call it) that I am, boot.iso: 3.53 MB 378.01 kB/s ncftp ...at-9-en/os/i386/images > pwd ftp://ftp.software.umn.edu/pub/linux/redhat/redhat-9-en/os/i386/images/ Stop whining. On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 11:21:52AM -0600, Todd Young wrote: > As usual, Matthew is wrong again. > > I didn't say that "no one" was seeing any improvement. I said that "I" > didn't see an improvement and I "implied" that each person's individual > results may vary. > > My bandwidth (according to the Cnet bandwidth tester) only improved > marginally, that could be because there are more people in my direct > area that are sharing the same "hub" as me, so I don't see a large > improvement. Or it could be any number of factors. Others, who have less > customers on their "hub" could see a very big improvement in the bandwidth. -- Matthew S. Hallacy FUBAR, LART, BOFH Certified http://www.poptix.net GPG public key 0x01938203 _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list