Leave the Schema alone, enough said. Sam. On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 12:06, Andy Zbikowski (Zibby) wrote: > | Looks cool, I'll have to check this out... Will this allow us to > | authenticate linux users on the windows AD? > > I know it offers NIS, maybe NIS+. I thinkit also allows for better LDAP > support. These are connected to AD, so the answer is yes, but not via > native AD. ;) Downside is I think it requires modifaction to the AD > Schema, which may not be an option in some orginazitons who like to > control who is in Enterprise Admins (a good idea really. Every MCSE with > a domain account in Enterprise Administrators would be a scary, scary > thing. :) ) > > As for using a Windows server to serve to UNIX clients...well it will > serve my needs. I mostly need to copy some large datastores (os images, > software installes, etc.) around, and don't need to worry much about > premissions. > > Andrew S. Zbikowski | http://www.ringworld.org > A password is like your underwear; Change it > frequently, don't share it with others, and > don't ask to borrow someone else's. > > > _______________________________________________ > TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list