On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:04:19AM -0500, Johnny Fulcrum wrote: > to dig a bit to find my doc - if you'd like... (I think I was using > wuftp....) Slightly off-topic, but I would recommend not using WuFTPd for new installations. I would also recommend migrating away from it for existing ones. The software has been a veritable nightmare of bugs and exploits. ProFTPd has had it's own shakey history. Here's my recommendation, but I'm not the only one who thinks so. Red Hat uses this software for their FTP mirrors: Package: vsftpd Priority: extra Section: net Installed-Size: 180 Maintainer: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at debian.org> Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.0-2 Provides: ftp-server Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libcap1, libpam0g (>= 0.72-1) Recommends: logrotate Filename: pool/main/v/vsftpd/vsftpd_1.0.0-2_i386.deb Size: 60082 MD5sum: 6b1faf046ee1203833f6ad7b2a542e71 Description: The Very Secure FTP Daemon A lightweight, efficient FTP server written from the ground up with security in mind. . vsftpd supports both anonymous and non-anonymous FTP, PAM authentication, bandwidth limiting, and the Linux sendfile() facility. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20030814/53f27b67/attachment.pgp