On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 11:11:03AM -0500, Munir Nassar wrote: > On Sat, 14 Sep 2002, Bob Tanner wrote: > > > This is an official notice. > > > > Please keep your post related to linux, (and related technologies), open > > source, networking, etc. > > i do not think that this is a good idea, > > what about BSD? there a a couple of BSD users around here (hey gabe!) and > how about MacOSX(hey spencet!) is it covered too? > > how about someone implementing samba on the server side, and he has a > client side question can they? Munir, read Bob's snippet. > how about .sigs? they kinda started this, are they supposed to conform > too? I was expecting a statement about this too... > > are we going to have a "list" of approved subjects we can talk about? > kinda reminds me of the "list" of approved websites chinese people can go > to I think Bob wanted to go that far, but as list owner he was invited to make a statement. Common sense should apply, although the "common" part is less than it is thought to be. florin -- "If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is." 41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020915/0eca92c9/attachment.pgp