On Friday 10 May 2002 07:17, Mike Hicks wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 17:27, Nate Carlson wrote: > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Kelly Black wrote: > > > I would second that. I am running one here at work, and it works > > > fine, but it was a bear to set up. > > > > It's also insecure, and the code is prone to causing kernel panics under > > certain situations. > > That's far better than PPTP, eh? Eh? I am pretty sure Nate was talking about PPTP using PoPToP. I have not as of yet experienced kernel panics. The insecurity can be partially dealt with by applying a patch that only allows connections from hosts running 128 bit encryption. If I had it to do over again, I would have probably gone for IPSEC and if the user was going to use Windows 98, buy one of the clients. I think W2K has a client that can be used out of the box, but don't quote me. Kelly Black KB0GBJ