On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 17:27, Nate Carlson wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Kelly Black wrote: > > I would second that. I am running one here at work, and it works > > fine, but it was a bear to set up. > > It's also insecure, and the code is prone to causing kernel panics under > certain situations. That's far better than PPTP, eh? I haven't played with IPSec stuff very much. I tried compiling a FreeS/WAN kernel once, but I'm not sure it worked. (Or maybe I got it to compile, but I didn't have another host to talk to, or something like that..) Anyway, I guess I'm not the only one who thought it was annoying. I came across ipsec_tunnel the other day. I haven't tried it out, but it's supposedly much simpler to use. It uses the cryptoapi system, which I guess is a new version of the old international crypto patches from kerneli.org. http://cryptoapi.sourceforge.net/ http://ringstrom.mine.nu/ipsec_tunnel/ -- _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ Error 103: Dead mouse in / \/ \(_)| ' // ._\ / - \(_)/ ./| ' /(__ hard drive. \_||_/|_||_|_\\___/ \_-_/|_|\__\|_|_\ __) [ Mike Hicks | http://umn.edu/~hick0088/ | mailto:hick0088 at tc.umn.edu ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020510/5a56c877/attachment.pgp