> Quoting David Dyer-Bennet (dd-b at dd-b.net):
> > Whatcha got against daemontools?  I see less reason to 
> object to them
> > than to qmail; while I use and like qmail, I can see why it wouldn't
> > fit other environments well.  But daemontools really do their nice
> > simple job very cleanly.  However, if your mind's made up 
> never mind. 
> 
> Many people have issue with DJB's view of the world.

I run daemontools on several of my boxes for various things, and while it
does work, I have problems with it looping and starting a whole bunch of the
same process sometimes.  In this particular case, I need to have something
that *won't* screw up because of the nature of what this particular process
does.

Jay








> -- 
> Minneapolis St. Paul Twin Cities MN        | Phone : (952)943-8700
> http://www.mn-linux.org Minnesota Linux    | Fax   : (952)943-8500
> Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. 
> Paul, Minnesota
> http://www.mn-linux.org
> tclug-list at mn-linux.org
> https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list
>