Well we all have to follow the rules to some extent. Not that I would actually turn anyone in, but this activity is increasing and there is only so much bandwidth available at anyone time using XYZ technology. How would my neighbors feel if I setup a multi-band 100W RF repeater in my backyard? The FCC forbids it and every radio reciever within several hundred yards would get stepped on by my RF traffic (interference), but hey...if I can get away with it why not. I'm bucking the rules, I'm my own service provider, I'm cool. And in a very short while...I'm off. Cable modem service is $40-50 bucks a month. I get a guarenteed minimum of service provided users follow certain policies. I don't think this business model is new to anyone. When this certain class of bandwidth use is specified and allowed by AT&T, host to your hearts content. Until then, pay to use the many accepted hosting services. Nuff said. On Wednesday 16 January 2002 11:14 am, Troy.A Johnson wrote: > Interesting. > > Not what I would expect, though. > > Support for the web as a read only service, > and total buy-in to cable ISP policies(/shackles). > > I want customers like you! ;-) > > >>> rahrenstorff at mediaone.net 01/15/02 09:41PM >>> > > > > I might just go and report users I find hosting such sites! > > Hows that settle in your gullet? > > One day your site is there, the next...it ain't.