On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0600, Phil Mendelsohn wrote: > Can anyone give me a read on how portable PNG files really are? > I figure everyone can read them, but before putting a bunch in a web > site, I thought I'd get some feedback. I also read some opinions on > the GIMP site that made it sound like they were superior for some > reason to .gif or .jpg files. Any opinions here on how? IE >= 4.0 Netscape >= 6.0 Mozilla Opera They are better than .gif because of the license and better than jpg because they are loseless and have alpha channel. florin -- "If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is." 41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020104/1bf35db9/attachment.pgp