>>>>> "DS" == Dave Sherohman <esper at sherohman.org> writes:

    DS> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 08:28:50AM -0600, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
    >> Could this at all be our fault?  Should we be marking the list mails
    >> as "Bulk"?

    DS> You mean like adding a header that says:

    DS> Precedence: bulk

    DS> ?  Or we could indicate that this is coming from a Mailman list with
    DS> something like:

    DS> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8

    DS> but that might be too specific, so it might be better to indicate, in
    DS> a more generic fashion, that it's a mailing list by using:

    DS> List-Id: Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List <tclug-list.mn-linux.org>

    DS> which should be applicable to any mailing list, regardless of the
    DS> software running it.

    DS> Oh, wait a minute - all three of those headers are already there.
    DS> Never mind.

Whoops.  I must have been looking at one of MY messages to the List,
BCC'ed to me which, of course, since it didn't ever reach the list,
didn't get the headers.

Sorry! 

Please stop the brickbats now.  I was wrong, ok?

R