On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 08:17:58AM -0600, Dan Drake wrote: > Whose bright idea was it to have `j' be the option for handling > bzipped tarballs? There was a conflict with the original GNU tar application binding for bzip2: 'I'. It conflicts with other *NIX/BSD'ish use of that same option. Other characters were suggested, but 'j' was settled upon as the default by the GNU tar maintainers. I'm assuming that Brad at the Math department ran into the same conflict, but instead of following the development discussions on the GNU tar email list, he chose -y because it wasn't being used. This last is just an assumption on my part, but knowing Brad, I don't think it's too far from the truth. -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Get my public key, ICQ#, etc. $(mailx -s 'get info' chewie at wookimus.net) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020218/519284d1/attachment.pgp