On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:05:53AM -0600, Nate Straz wrote: >On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 08:17:58AM -0600, Dan Drake wrote: >> Whose bright idea was it to have `j' be the option for handling bzipped >> tarballs? And whose not-very-bright-at-all idea was it to *change* that >> to `y'? My Debian unstable system has "j tar", the math department has >> "y tar". It drives me nuts! > Write a wrapper script that runs "file", checks tar version and acts accordingly. Personally I try to make sure my machines are all fairly standard across the board that way. It's not just admins who use my machines and users tend to bitch about that stuff. -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. pub 1024D/9A0DDC59 2001-12-12 Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> Key fingerprint = 8FCD A1EE CEA7 DEE1 9361 F32C 0A90 30D1 9A0D DC59 sub 1024g/1FC75C99 2001-12-12 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020218/b7d9eb2d/attachment.pgp