On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 16:36, Jacqueline Urick wrote: > Well my opinion on the matter is this. I don't purposely send HTML email to > list and I try to adhere to most of the "list ettiquette". I try to be very > conscious about that. I also know that thanks to using outlook, I sent a > virus to the list once. I apologized for that. That was not only really > embarassing, but I lost several hours of work time because of it. I know > outlook sucks. There's a plugin for evolution for using some of the more "high-tech" features of Exchange server. It'll cost you a few bucks, and I can't verify it's stability cause we just have that crappy linux garbage here for our mail services :-) Might end up getting an exchange server though for shared folders and centralized calendaring for the business side of the house someday when we can afford the licensing. > I think most of us outlook users are in the same boat, we use outlook for > work. My client uses outlook for the calendaring and contact features. I > don't think we should be singled out for that. I have made an effort to get > my clients to use linux where it is applicable to their business and mine, > i.e. hosting their sites, etc. > > > > ~jacque > > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list > -- Ben Lutgens http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ Sistina Software Inc. pub 1024D/9A0DDC59 2001-12-12 Ben Lutgens <blutgens at sistina.com> Key fingerprint = 8FCD A1EE CEA7 DEE1 9361 F32C 0A90 30D1 9A0D DC59 sub 1024g/1FC75C99 2001-12-12 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020204/fc209059/attachment.pgp