On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:01:17PM -0500, Brent Metzler wrote:
>
>Well, one reason you might want a service disabled instead of removed is
>if you need to use it only at certain times.  For instance, I have Samba
>installed but don't have it start at boot-up.  The only time I need to
>use Samba is to access shares from a Windows box.  So I'll only start
>Samba if I need to access it from a Windows box, which is rare.

Why not use a superserver like xinetd or inetd?

>
>And most of all, for security sake.

And what with the doze boxen on your network you've got enough to worry
about.


-- 
Ben Lutgens				 | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/	
System Administrator	 | http://www.sistina.com/
Sistina Software Inc. | 

"If you love something set it free, if it doesn't come back to you
hunt it down and set it on fire" -- George Carlin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020820/8289b2d3/attachment.pgp