just to pour acetone on the raging debate ... i thought that this article regarding the applications in question was interesting. it came across desk the other day. http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20020701S0007 when last we saw our hero (Monday, Aug 05, 2002), Joel Rosenberg was madly tapping out: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 25 July 2002 12:22 pm, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > Enough with this deragatory name calling. > > As opposed to pleasant name calling? > > > Microsoft created a > > superior product with Outlook and Exchange. > > Yes and no. Outlook and Exchange have capabilities that I've not seen > in an open source variant; they also have vulnerabilities and > limitations that I've seen to be absent from many open source > applications. > > { snipped - misc .signatures } -- steve ulrich sulrich at botwerks.org PGP: 8D0B 0EE9 E700 A6CF ABA7 AE5F 4FD4 07C9 133B FAFC