he should use his home computer for tclug. this will avoid the "dilbert" problem in large companies ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee J. Behrens" <lbehrens at boolion.com> To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [TCLUG] [MXSFRCOCHA01-SA at EmersonProcess.com: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t aken.] > >>For everyones enjoyment, perhaps we can zap this person from the list. > > >I second the motion. What tool. > > Maybe the guy subscribes from his work account. Some companies have a Big > Brother in place to make sure its employees aren't contributing to a hostile > workplace, and use the automated response to remind everyone B.B. is > watching. > > Complain all you want. Dump him if you like. But somehow I don't think some > of the recent posts are going to help him plead his case, that the automated > system should not reply to a mailing list. > > Lee > _______________________________________________ > Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota > http://www.mn-linux.org > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >