On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:06:13AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote: > >Windows XP is evily seductive, however. I've been messing with it today >in prep for a lanparty this weekend (linux doesn't run games i want to >play, life sucks, not much I can do but give money to programmers to fix >this i guess) and theres enough hackish-settings in the powetoys >(virtual desktops, mouse focus, etc) to make it workable. Is there some reason you picked XP over windows 2000? I'm quite happy with win2k. It's stable and just _works_. Granted I'd rather use a *nix, but if you have to use windows for things.... I haven't had the chance to play with XP, the buzz is that it'll be the nail-in-the-coffin of samba, have you messed with this? > >But, I dont really want to run windows full time (ick). I allready had >2 bluescreens. That's not good. -- This space intentionally left blank. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20011026/99bb785c/attachment.pgp