I am sure somebody will find one in short order. My point was that I can not believe developers have done there testing in the 2.4 "Stable" series instead of branching and starting the 2.5 series, as they should have 9 months ago. I think the Linux kernel should be maintained via cvs/cvsup instead of bulk archive downloads -- but that is another issue. Create one tree for stable and one tree for current, in the FreeBSD model. Tom Veldhouse veldy at veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chad C. Walstrom" <chewie at wookimus.net> To: <tclug-list at mn-linux.org> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:55 AM Subject: Re: [TCLUG] 2.4.15/2.5 fs bug On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:50:47AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I am beginning to give up hope of EVER having a stable kernel with out MAJOR > bugs in the 2.4 series of Linux. What the hell is Linus doing these days > for development -- testing out in 2.4? ChangeLog for 2.4.16: final: - Fix 8139too oops (Philipp Matthias Hahn) pre1: - Correctly sync inodes in iput() (Alexander Viro) - Make pagecache readahead size tunable via /proc (was in -ac tree) - Fix PPC kernel compilation problems (Paul Mackerras) Doesn't look like a whole lot of changes to me. You can probably start breathing normally again, Tom. ;-) -- Chad Walstrom <chewie at wookimus.net> | a.k.a. ^chewie http://www.wookimus.net/ | s.k.a. gunnarr Key fingerprint = B4AB D627 9CBD 687E 7A31 1950 0CC7 0B18 206C 5AFD